Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 5 results ...

Chen, P H and Chang, L M (2002) Feasibility analysis of Taiwan high speed rail project. Journal of Construction Procurement, 8(01), 64–78.

Kumaraswamy, M, Rowlinson, S and Phua, F (2002) Accelerating cultural changes through innovative procurement processes: a Hong Kong perspective. Journal of Construction Procurement, 8(01), 3–16.

Merchant, A and Bajaj, D (2002) An analysis of the use of the "design-build" project delivery system by interior design firms, and its effectiveness in delivering fit-out projects. Journal of Construction Procurement, 8(01), 17–34.

Shen, Q and Liu, G (2002) Value management applications in China's construction industry. Journal of Construction Procurement, 8(01), 35–47.

Soetanto, R, Proverbs, D G and Cooper, P (2002) A tool for assessing contractor performance. Journal of Construction Procurement, 8(01), 48–63.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: assessment tool; coalition participants; contractor performance; perceptions; performance measures; satisfaction
  • ISBN/ISSN: 1358-9180
  • URL:
  • Abstract:
    Based on data collected from in-depth interviews with twelve experienced clients and nineteen experienced architects, a generic tool for the formal assessment of contractor performance is presented. Because of the unique characteristics and interdependence of the construction project coalition (i.e. architect, client and contractor), it was found that this approach to performance assessment should lead to improved relationships among the coalition. Findings revealed that cost, time and quality remain the most important performance criteria. However, other 'softer' measures of contractor performance were also found to be of important. These 'softer' measures were found to influence the nature and quality of relationships. It is recommended that the tool be used to promote more effective contractor performance and enhance relationships enabling continuous improvement. The ultimate aim is to develop similar tools for the assessment of all coalition participants based on a culture of openness and trust.